CAMBRIDGE 7/TASK 2
Some people who have been in prison become good citizen
later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to
teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The dangers of committing a crime for teenagers have became
the priority concern between parents today. Some of them think that avoid this
condition by learning directly with people who have been in prison is good way.
Personally, I extremely disagree that it will be the best method to protect the
youngster from a crime.
The main cause of committing a crime is the worst of moral
education among the society. Therefore, unsurprisingly there are many
criminality cases that surrounding people particularly for teenagers. To protect
children from it, they should enclose with positive environment, have some good
friendships, work in the good community, have valuable activities, and live
among the great brotherhood. From this condition they will be apart from the
dangers of violation automatically.
On the other hand, learning through someone’s experiences
is sometime the effective way to understand things. For instance, related with
this case, some people believe that learning from ex-prisoner’s experience will
be worth for their children protection. Yet, commonly most of people cannot
believe easily with people who have bad background such as ex-prisoners.
Moreover, family education is the best way to keep them safe from crime
influence, harmonic relation between the members of family is the main
foundation to make family education much more worth.
In conclusion, learning the experiences from people who
have been living in the prison is not bad method to protect children from
dangers of crime. However, the best way is increasing moral education started
from family relation itself.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar